Do the MGNREGA Beneficiaries Participate in Gram Shaba? A Case Study of Morigoan District of Assam

 

Author
Dr. Polakshi Bhattacharyya Baruah
Keywords
Participation; Gram Sabha; MGNREGA
Abstract
Several social expenditure schemes were under taken by the government since independent in almost all the prospects of human development like education, health, employment generation etc. But none of the scheme has yielded any satisfactory result so far. Several studies have reveals that the major reason behind its failure is the top down approach adopted in the implementation of the schemes. Taking into considerations the loopholes of the earlier development scheme, the UPA government launched another rural development programme namely MGNREGA with the bottom up approach of development with due importance to people’s participation. The term people participation gain momentum after the World Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (WCARRD) in 1979 concluded with a note of concern that the failures of most of the development programmes in developing countries are mainly due to the lack of active participation of the people for whom these programmes are designed. By now almost all the nations have increasing realization of the importance of people participation in the development programmes. This paper attempts to list out the people participation friendly provisions adopted in this programme and also the awareness level of the participants regarding this provisions and their participation in the gram sabha in the study area of Morigoan district of Assam.
References
[1] Aref, F. , “Farmers Participation in Agricultural Development: The Case of Fars Province, Iran”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2011, pp. 155-158.
[2] Asaduzzaman, M., “Governance in Practice: Decentralization and People’s Participation in the Local Government of Bangladesh”, Published PhD Thesis, University of Tampere press, 2008
[3] Azfar, O, Satu, K.S and Meagher, P., “Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings”, IRIS Center Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2000.
[4] Balwantrai Mehta Committee, “Report of the Team for the Study of Community Projects and National Extension Service”, Planning Commission, New Delhi, 1995.
[5] Bardhan,P. “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 16, Number 4: 185–205, pp. 2002
[6] Hans, P, Binswanger, M and Stephen, S., “Local and Community-Driven Development: Moving to Scale in Theory and Practice”, New Frontiers in Social Policy, Washington DC, World Bank, 2010.
[7] Khan, M. M., “Decentralization in Bangladesh: Myth or Reality”, A. H Development Publishing House, Dhaka, 2009.
[8] Mathew,G and Mathew, A., “India: Decentralization and Local Government: How Clientelism and Accountability work”, In Hadennius, A. (edited) Decentralization and Democratic Governance, Stockholm, Elanders Gotab, 2003.
[9] Pal, M., “Gram Sabha meeting in India: Process outcomes and Perspectives,” JOAAG, Vol. 4, No.2, 2009, pp. 80-93.

Received : 06 January 2020
Accepted : 08 July 2020
Published : 26 July 2020
DOI: 10.30726/ijmrss/v7.i3.2020.73014

Download “MGNREGA-Beneficiaries-Participate-in-Gram-Shaba-Morigoan-District-of-Assam.pdf” MGNREGA-Beneficiaries-Participate-in-Gram-Shaba-Morigoan-District-of-Assam.pdf – Downloaded 21 times – 221 KB