The Influence of Board Independent on Firm Performance of Sri Lankan Listed Companies

M. C. A. Nazar
Board Independent; Board of Directors; Firm Performance; ROA
The study investigates the effect of board independent on firm performance of Sri Lankan listed companies. This study employs a cross section analysis of 120 firms as sample of listed firms in Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) for the financial year ending2019 and multivariate analyses are used to test the proposed hypothesis. The board independent variable being the independent variable and firm performance (ROA) variable being the dependent variable are confirmed under regression model. The results of the study display that board independence is negatively connected with ROA. Further, Board size and CEO duality are significantly negatively associated with ROA. Moreover, a control variable of firm size is significantly positively connected with ROA and leverage is negatively related with ROA though not significant. The findings of the study indicate mixed results which are in consistent with empirical evidence of developed nation.
[1] Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996).Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders .Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
[2] Akbar, M.,Hussain, S., Ahmad, T., & Hassan, S. (2019) Corporate governance and firm performance in Pakistan: Dynamic Panel Estimation. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 12 (2).213-230.
[3] Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 921-963.
[4] Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577-593.
[5] Dahya, J., &Mc Connell, J.J. (2005), Outside directors and board decision, Journal of corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 37-60.
[6] Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V., &Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate performance and board structure in Belgian companies. Long Range Planning, 34(3), 383-398.
[7] Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983).Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
[8] Fooladi, M. (2012).Board characteristics and firm performance, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5), 688-694.
[9] Fosberg, R.H., & Nelson, M.R., (1999), Leadership structure and firm performance, International Review of Financial Analysis, 8(1), 83-96.
[10] Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H.(1976),Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
[11] Lee, Y.S., Rosenteins, S., & Wyatt, J.G. (1999).The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards, International Review of Economics and Finance, 8(4), 421-431.
[12] Leung, S., Richardson, G., & Jaggi, B. (2014). Corporate board and board committee independence, firms performance, and family ownership concentration: An analysis based on Hong Kong firms, 10(1), 16-31.
[13] Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2015).Board independence and firm performance in China.Journal of corporate Finance, 30, 223-244.
[14] O’Connell, V., & Cramer, N. (2010).The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland. European Management Journal, 28(5), 387-399.
[15] Stiles, P. & Taylor, B. (2001) Boards at work: how directors view their roles and responsibilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[16] Weir, L. & Laing.D. (2001). Governance structures, director independence and corporate performance in the U.K. European Business Review, 13(2), 86-94, 2001.
[17] Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
[18] Zubaidah, Z.A., Nurmala, M.K., & Kamaruzaman, J. (2009), Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 1(1), pp. 150-164.

Received : 13 February 2021
Accepted : 03 April 2021
Published : 08 April 2021
DOI: 10.30726/ijmrss/v8.i2.2021.82007